They argue that Ukraine is somehow an existential threat to Russia. However, it is Russia that started the war against Ukraine, and if this war is not an existential threat – with the whole West against Russia – because of the nuclear weapons that Russia possesses, then how can the fact that Russia poses an existential threat? Ukraine moves away from Russia's sphere of influence? It is clear that such a situation would be much more benign than the war we have now.
The Kremlin chose to go to war. Even now, Russia feels safe enough to continue the war, even with Western countries supplying Ukraine with weapons. In my opinion, this has nothing to do south africa phone number list with security, but with imperialist interests and the imperial ideology that characterizes the Russian regime. He has an imperial vision towards the post-Soviet space and, specifically, towards the Ukraine. You cannot tolerate Ukraine being a sovereign country.
That is the essential. You claim that Ukraine wanted to get closer to the West. If we look at Russia's trajectory at the beginning of this century, we see that it too had the same purpose. However, in apparent contradiction to this situation, we have seen that Russia is not afraid of confronting the West directly, whether in the Ukraine or in Syria and other countries, perhaps as no other country has done. How do you explain this contradiction of century Russia? I fully agree that it is a paradox and difficult to explain using existing theories of imperialism.